Adult-Themed Cruise to Antarctica: Theme Park Tourism or Isolated Incident?
An unusual event in Antarctic tourism unfolded in January 2025, prompting discussions about the evolving nature of travel to this unique region. The expedition vessel of a well-known cruise line was fully chartered by a travel agency to host an “adult-themed” voyage, marketed as the “7th Continent Adventure.” This development has ignited debate on whether it signifies a step towards a more commodified, theme park-like approach to Antarctic tourism, or if it should be regarded as a singular, isolated occurrence.
Editorial note: In this article, we deliberately refrain from naming the specific companies involved in this event, as our intention is not to provide advertisement or moralize about the nature of the cruise, but to analyze the broader implications for Antarctic tourism.
An adventure for adults only
The “7th Continent Adventure,” commencing in mid-January 2025, was specifically targeted at couples aged 21 and above seeking a fusion of Antarctic exploration and adult-oriented entertainment. Promotional materials advertised themed evenings, such as “Naughty Nautical” and “Fetish,” alongside a dedicated “playroom” operating around the clock, and seminars on subjects ranging from ethical non-monogamy to tantra. The cruise promised an “erotic adventure” against the backdrop of the Antarctic wilderness.
Operationally, the cruise, managed by the vessel operator, adhered to the established guidelines of the International Association of Antarctica Tour Operators (IAATO). IAATO, the self-regulatory body governing Antarctic tourism, mandates stringent protocols focused on minimizing environmental impact and ensuring operational safety. These guidelines were reportedly presented to all passengers. While excursions were offered separately, their availability indicated that traditional Antarctic sightseeing remained an option, albeit not a core component of the themed cruise. The charterer noted that the vessel operator was “eager to host the event,” suggesting a commercial interest in broadening the spectrum of Antarctic cruise offerings. The travel agency also implemented a “Rules and Regulations Policy” for its clientele, with designated play areas ensuring that adult-themed activities were localized within the vessel.
“What happens onboard stays onboard”
The regulatory framework for Antarctic tourism is critical to understanding this event. The IAATO regulatory framework is primarily concerned with environmental protection and safety during excursions and landings. Activities that take place exclusively on board chartered vessels do not fall within the direct scope of responsibility of the IAATO, as long as they do not violate the overarching system of the Antarctic Treaty. Normally, “what happens onboard stays onboard” applies, as long as the activities do not violate regulations and laws to which the ship operator is subject.
The announcement of this cruise triggered considerable controversy, particularly concerning its perceived incongruity with the sensitive Antarctic environment. Critics voiced concerns about the appropriateness of “sex cruises” in Antarctica, with some commentators arguing they were “deeply distasteful” and could accelerate the “degradation of Earth’s last great wilderness.” These concerns are amplified by the context of increasing Antarctic tourism. In the 2023-2024 season, Antarctica saw over 80,000 landed visits and over 43,000 cruise-only visitors, alongside a smaller number of deep field visitors. Visitor numbers have risen tenfold between 1990 and 2020, with this growth coupled with a diversification of tourism activities including kayaking, submersible trips, and helicopter excursions.
This raises concerns about cumulative environmental impacts, notably carbon emissions, potential wildlife disturbance, and the risk of introducing invasive species. Research indicates that tourism activities can alter penguin reproductive and social behaviors, and black carbon deposition from ship exhaust is shown to accelerate snow melt. A recent scientific paper emphasizes the potential for certain tourism products to contribute to a detachment from the unique qualities of Antarctica, potentially transforming it into a “placeless space of consumption”.
While IAATO advocates for responsible tourism and implements mitigation strategies, some experts argue that self-regulation may be insufficient to protect Antarctica’s fragile ecosystems from escalating tourism pressures. The IUCN highlights that existing regulations may not adequately protect Antarctica from tourism impacts and calls for more effective and proactive management based on science and best practices.
Theme park or educational future
The question of Antarctica becoming a ‘theme park destination’ is not entirely new. Discussions arose in the past around family-themed cruises, most notably when Disney announced intentions to offer such voyages. While Disney Cruise Line did launch Antarctic expeditions through its “Adventures by Disney” program, their apparent discontinuation in the coming years suggests that large-scale, family-focused mass tourism from major theme park brands may not be an immediate and escalating trend for Antarctica. This raises the question of whether the recent adult-themed cruise should be viewed similarly – as a potentially controversial but ultimately isolated event, rather than a definitive step towards the widespread commodification of Antarctica as a themed tourism destination.
Conversely, Antarctic tourism can also be viewed as a potential force for good. It can offer inspirational and educational experiences, fostering public support for Antarctic conservation and creating “ambassadors” for the region’s protection. IAATO emphasizes responsible tourism and has implemented measures like visitor site guidelines and restrictions on visitor numbers at landing sites. However, the increasing scale and diversification of tourism, as well as the inherent carbon footprint of long-distance travel to Antarctica (averaging 3.76 tons of CO2 per tourist), present significant challenges.
The chartered cruise, while contentious, operated within the current regulatory and IAATO framework for ship-based tourism. Whether it marks a transition towards a “theme-park destination Antarctica” is subject to interpretation. It could be considered an isolated instance, a niche event leveraging a specific market segment without fundamentally changing the broader trajectory of Antarctic tourism. Alternatively, it underscores the inherent and growing tensions between commercial interests seeking to capitalize on Antarctica’s allure, and the critical imperative to safeguard its vulnerable environment for future generations.
If not even close to an example of misconduct, events such this one might again serve as a critical juncture, prompting ongoing evaluation and debate regarding the sustainable management and future direction of tourism in Antarctica, including discussions about potential visitor limits, stricter regulations, and the adequacy of self-regulation in the face of increasing and diversifying tourism activities. Some propose considering Antarctica as a national park with entrance fees as a possible management strategy. In any case, the topic will offer a lot of discussion at the upcoming ATCM meeting in Milano, Italy and will remain hot, adult-themed or not.
More on the subject
