PORT LAWNA: The Failure of a Billion-Dollar Project

New facilities at the Lawna coal transshipment complex in Murmansk have been commissioned as part of the latest expansion phase of the coal terminal. Together with the existing infrastructure, the port’s production capacity has now increased to 12 million tonnes of coal per year. According to the State Transport Leasing Company (GTLK), this represents 67% of the planned capacity of the Lawna terminal.
The Port of Lawna near Murmansk was intended to become one of Russia’s most important coal export terminals. As a key component of the Murmansk transport hub, the modern ice-free deep-water port was designed to channel a growing share of Russian coal exports through northern shipping routes and to open up new markets in Asia and India. The project was planned over nearly two decades and implemented through investments worth billions of dollars.

By the time the terminal finally entered service, however, the economic and geopolitical environment had changed fundamentally. Following the outbreak of the war in Ukraine, Russian coal producers lost important markets in Europe. Export volumes declined, transport routes became more complicated, and private investor interest weakened significantly. A project that had originally been backed by major coal companies could ultimately only be completed through state loans, subsidies, and other forms of government support.
Today, the port’s greatest problem is a lack of cargo. Lawna was designed to handle 18 million tonnes of coal annually. In reality, only around one million tonnes were shipped through the terminal in 2025. At the same time, coal transshipment volumes in Murmansk have been declining for years. In the first quarter of 2026, throughput was significantly below the previous year’s level and far below the record volumes achieved in 2020.

The port therefore faces a fundamental contradiction: it was built for growing export volumes but began operations during a period of shrinking demand. As early as 2016, parts of the Murmansk transport hub project had been suspended due to a lack of economic viability. The same question now arises again—but only after billions have already been invested.
The project has also come under financial pressure. According to media reports, the main contractor, TEK Mosenergo, has encountered difficulties in paying subcontractors. In addition, Russia’s Accounts Chamber identified financial irregularities in the implementation of the overall project by the responsible state agency during an audit.
The idea for the port dates back to the mid-2000s. Alongside economic objectives, environmental considerations also played an important role. For years, open coal handling operations within the city limits of Murmansk caused significant coal dust pollution. Lawna was therefore built as a modern alternative on the opposite shore of Kola Bay. Enclosed unloading facilities, covered conveyor systems, and dust-suppression technologies were intended to reduce environmental impacts and improve the quality of life for local residents.
Today, however, it remains uncertain whether the multibillion-dollar investment will ever pay off. Rather than symbolizing the expansion of Russia’s export infrastructure, Lawna is increasingly viewed by many observers as an example of how quickly long-term economic forecasts can be overtaken by geopolitical upheavals and changing market conditions.
Heiner Kubny, PolarJournal